[Olympus developers 27]: Re: cmucltk changes

[Antoine Raux]

Until we have a Linux version of Olympus, I'm in favor of not 
introducing a Cygwin dependency, so I prefer solution 1), although I 
don't know how hard that would be...

antoine

TK Harris wrote:
> Recent changes have broken the Visual Studio build of the cmucltk, 
> which Olympus depends on. The stable 2.1 branch of Olympus is pegged 
> to an older version of the toolkit, so for now only the trunk is 
> affected. I see that Alex has improved the cygwin build so that it's 
> well integrated with the linux builds, and yet builds native Windows 
> executables, also it looks like there are binaries checked in.
> We can either
> 1) fix the VS build
> 2) just use checked-in executables
> 3) require cygwin for an Olympus build
>
> I don't really like any of these options; they each have some 
> negatives. I'm open to suggestions.
>
> -Thomas
>