[ACT-R-users] similarity in partial-matching/blending
Laura Hiatt
laura.hiatt at nrl.navy.mil
Wed Apr 24 10:24:19 EDT 2013
Thanks for the great feedback, everyone! We have a new ACT-R-based approach to similarity that we are developing here, based on base-level / spreading activation values as the model runs (paper at CogSci this sumer); I am looking to test it in a variety of situations (such as blending).
Thanks again,
Laura
On Apr 23, 2013, at 9:11 AM, "Ball, Jerry T Civ USAF AFMC 711 HPW/RHAC" <Jerry.Ball at wpafb.af.mil> wrote:
> Laura,
>
> Troy's comment reminds me that Raluca Bidiu used LSA to set similarity
> values in her research on "the Moses illusion". Here's a paper:
>
> Budiu, R. & Anderson, J. R. (2004). Interpretation-Based Processing: A
> Unified Theory of Semantic Sentence Processing. Cognitive Science 28, 1-44.
>
> The paper is available on the ACT-R web site under "Language Processing:
> Analogy and Metaphor".
>
> Jerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: act-r-users-bounces at act-r.psy.cmu.edu
> [mailto:act-r-users-bounces at act-r.psy.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of Kelley, Troy D
> CIV (US)
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 8:35 AM
> To: Magill, Laura M CIV (US); ACT-R-users at act-r.psy.cmu.edu
> Subject: Re: [ACT-R-users] similarity in partial-matching/blending
>
> Laura,
>
> "Dynamically during runs" sounds interesting. I have also been thinking
> that using something like Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) or the similarity
> values in ConceptNet might be a useful way of setting the initial values.
>
> Troy D. Kelley
> RDRL-HRS-E
> Cognitive Robotics and Modeling Team Leader Human Research and Engineering
> Directorate U.S. Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen, MD 21005 Phone
> 410-278-5869 or 410-278-6748 Note my new email address:
> troy.d.kelley6.civ at mail.mil
>
>
>
> On 4/22/13 10:27 AM, "Laura Hiatt" <laura.hiatt at nrl.navy.mil> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am looking for pointers to papers or work on
>> partial-matching/blending that utilizes similarity values between
>> chunks. Much of what I have read using these mechanisms relies on
> numerical values (like blending utility values).
>> Lately we have been working on studying similarity between chunks, and
>> how we can calculate it dynamically during model runs; I would love to
>> be able to compare what we've come up with to some other approaches to
> similarity.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Laura
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ACT-R-users mailing list
>> ACT-R-users at act-r.psy.cmu.edu
>> https://mailman.srv.cs.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/act-r-users
>
> Troy D. Kelley
> RDRL-HRS-E
> Cognitive Robotics and Modeling Team Leader Human Research and Engineering
> Directorate U.S. Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen, MD 21005 Phone
> 410-278-5869 or 410-278-6748 Note my new email address:
> troy.d.kelley6.civ at mail.mil
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ACT-R-users mailing list
> ACT-R-users at act-r.psy.cmu.edu
> https://mailman.srv.cs.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/act-r-users
More information about the ACT-R-users
mailing list