[ACT-R-users] ACT-R hits the high street

[Susan Chipman]

      Could indeed lead to problems.  Not necessarily "classified" but in
recent years there has been an irritating middle ground for research
managers such as I was.  "Classified" or not classified is easier to deal
with.  This sort of problem gets worse as priorities move away from basic
research.
       On the other hand, someone may have hoped that making it a critical
technology would result in a better funding situation.  And they may not
have had modeling of humans in mind..

Susan


On 10/9/07, Wayne Gray <grayw at rpi.edu> wrote:
>
> Does this mean that all of our research reports will now be
> classified and that we will not be able to export the reports or our
> models to foreign countries?
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 9, 2007, at 15:22, Bonnie John wrote:
>
> > While not quite as exciting, the US House of Representatives recently
> > resolved that modeling is a National Critical Technology. Don't you
> > feel
> > special?
> > Bonnie
> >
> >
> > H. Res. 487
> > In the House of Representatives, U. S.,
> > July 16, 2007.
> > Whereas the United States of America is a great and prosperous Nation,
> > and modeling and simulation contribute significantly to that greatness
> > and prosperity;…
> >
> > Whereas modeling and simulation frequently complements or replaces
> > experimentation where experimentation is hazardous, expensive, or
> > impossible, thus providing far greater capability than experimentation
> > alone;…
> >
> > Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
> > (1) commends those who have contributed to the modeling and simulation
> > efforts which have developed essential characteristics of our Nation;…
> > (4) recognizes modeling and simulation as a National Critical
> > Technology;…
> >
> >
> >
> > Larry Daily wrote:
> >> David,
> >>
> >> While I agree with you in general, I found L. Helmsley's model of
> >> end-of-life decision-making quite interesting. I do think the
> >> conflict
> >> resolution parameter was a bit off, though.
> >>
> >> Larry
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: act-r-users-bounces at act-r.psy.cmu.edu
> >> [mailto:act-r-users-bounces at act-r.psy.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of David
> >> Peebles
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 11:22 AM
> >> To: Hedderik van Rijn
> >> Cc: act-r-users at act-r.psy.cmu.edu
> >> Subject: Re: [ACT-R-users] ACT-R hits the high street
> >>
> >> I've read it (I get it every week just for the cognitive modelling
> >> articles and the fashion tips) and although it's a UK based ACT-R
> >> modeller they interviewed, but of course naming no names (it was
> >> Howes),
> >> it's nothing special -- just the same old "Oh, it was a nightmare
> >> trying
> >> to fit the model -- it nearly killed me getting a stable value for
> >> the
> >> learning parameter and Dan was no help at all etc. etc..."  You get
> >> these cognitive modelling sob stories in the fashion weeklies all the
> >> time in the UK.  It's old news.  Move along, nothing to see here...
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Hedderik van Rijn [mailto:hedderik at van-rijn.org]
> >>> Sent: 09 October 2007 14:37
> >>> To: David Peebles
> >>> Cc: act-r-users at act-r.psy.cmu.edu
> >>> Subject: Re: [ACT-R-users] ACT-R hits the high street
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Wow, modelling is really hot in the UK! It's even making it to the
> >>> cover of the glossies! I'm wondering who they interviewed...
> >>>
> >>>   - Hedderik.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged.
> >> If you
> >> receive it in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and
> >> remove
> >> it from your system. If the content of this e-mail does not relate to
> >> the business of the University of Huddersfield, then we do not
> >> endorse
> >> it and will accept no liability.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ACT-R-users mailing list
> >> ACT-R-users at act-r.psy.cmu.edu
> >> http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/act-r-users
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ACT-R-users mailing list
> >> ACT-R-users at act-r.psy.cmu.edu
> >> http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/act-r-users
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ACT-R-users mailing list
> > ACT-R-users at act-r.psy.cmu.edu
> > http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/act-r-users
> >
>
> **Rensselaer**Rensselaer**Rensselaer**Rensselaer**Rensselaer**
> Wayne D. Gray; Professor of Cognitive Science
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
> Carnegie Building (rm 108) ;;for all surface mail & deliveries
> 110 8th St.; Troy, NY 12180
>
> EMAIL: grayw at rpi.edu, Office: 518-276-3315, Fax: 518-276-3017
>
> for general information see: http://www.rpi.edu/~grayw/
>
> for On-Line publications see: http://www.rpi.edu/~grayw/pubs/
> downloadable_pubs.htm
>
> for the CogWorks Lab see: http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/cogworks/
>
> If you just have formalisms or a model you are doing "operations
> research" or" AI", if you just have data and a good study you are
> doing "experimental psychology", and if you just have ideas you are
> doing "philosophy" -- it takes all three to do cognitive science.
>
> **Rensselaer**Rensselaer**Rensselaer**Rensselaer**Rensselaer**
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ACT-R-users mailing list
> ACT-R-users at act-r.psy.cmu.edu
> http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/act-r-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.srv.cs.cmu.edu/pipermail/act-r-users/attachments/20071009/3a648c9e/attachment.html>