Consciousness and Connectionism: BBS Call for Commentators
Stevan Harnad
harnad at cogsci.soton.ac.uk
Wed Jan 14 15:47:58 EST 1998
Below is the abstract of a forthcoming BBS target article on:
A CONNECTIONIST THEORY OF PHENOMENAL EXPERIENCE
by Gerard O'Brien and John Opie
This article has been accepted for publication in Behavioral and Brain
Sciences (BBS), an international, interdisciplinary journal providing
Open Peer Commentary on important and controversial current research in
the biobehavioral and cognitive sciences.
Commentators must be BBS Associates or nominated by a BBS Associate. To
be considered as a commentator for this article, to suggest other
appropriate commentators, or for information about how to become a BBS
Associate, please send EMAIL to:
bbs at cogsci.soton.ac.uk
or write to:
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Department of Psychology
University of Southampton
Highfield, Southampton
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/bbs/
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/
ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/BBS/
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/bbs/
gopher://gopher.princeton.edu:70/11/.libraries/.pujournals
If you are not a BBS Associate, please send your CV and the name of a
BBS Associate (there are currently over 10,000 worldwide) who is
familiar with your work. All past BBS authors, referees and commentators
are eligible to become BBS Associates.
To help us put together a balanced list of commentators, please give
some indication of the aspects of the topic on which you would bring
your areas of expertise to bear if you were selected as a commentator.
An electronic draft of the full text is available for inspection
with a WWW browser, anonymous ftp or gopher according to the
instructions that follow after the abstract.
____________________________________________________________________
A CONNECTIONIST THEORY OF PHENOMENAL EXPERIENCE
Gerard O'Brien and John Opie
Department of Philosophy
The University of Adelaide
South Australia 5005
AUSTRALIA
KEYWORDS: computation, connectionism, consciousness,
dissociation, mental representation, phenomenal experience
ABSTRACT: When cognitive scientists apply computational theory to the
problem of phenomenal consciousness, as many of them have been doing
recently, there are two fundamentally distinct approaches available.
Either consciousness is to be explained in terms of the nature of the
representational vehicles the brain deploys, or it is to be explained
in terms of the computational processes defined over these vehicles.
We call versions of these two approaches VEHICLE and PROCESS theories
of consciousness, respectively. However, while there may be space for
vehicle theories of consciousness in cognitive science, they are
relatively rare. This is because of the influence exerted, on the one
hand, by a large body of research which purports to show that the
explicit representation of information in the brain and conscious
experience are dissociable, and on the other, by the classical
computational theory of mind: the theory that takes human cognition
to be a species of symbol manipulation. Two recent developments in
cognitive science combine to suggest that a reappraisal of this
situation is in order. First, a number of theorists have
recently been highly critical of the experimental methodologies
used in the dissociation studies -- so critical, in fact, that
it is no longer reasonable to assume that the dissociability of
conscious experience and explicit representation has been
adequately demonstrated. Second, computationalism, as a theory
of human cognition, is no longer as dominant in cognitive
science as it once was. It now has a lively competitor in the
form of connectionism; and connectionism, unlike
computationalism, does have the computational resources to
support a robust vehicle theory of consciousness. In this paper
we develop and defend this connectionist-vehicle theory of
consciousness. It takes the form of the following simple
empirical hypothesis: phenomenal experience consists in the
explicit representation of information in neurally realized pdp
networks. This hypothesis leads us to reassess some common
wisdom about consciousness, but, we will argue, in fruitful and
ultimately plausible ways.
--------------------------------------------------------------
To help you decide whether you would be an appropriate commentator for
this article, an electronic draft is retrievable from the World Wide
Web or by anonymous ftp or gopher from the US or UK BBS Archive.
Ftp instructions follow below. Please do not prepare a commentary on
this draft. Just let us know, after having inspected it, what relevant
expertise you feel you would bring to bear on what aspect of the
article.
The URLs you can use to get to the BBS Archive:
http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/bbs/
http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/Archive/bbs.obrien.html
ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/BBS/bbs.obrien
ftp://ftp.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/pub/bbs/Archive/bbs.obrien
gopher://gopher.princeton.edu:70/11/.libraries/.pujournals
To retrieve a file by ftp from an Internet site, type either:
ftp ftp.princeton.edu
or
ftp 128.112.128.1
When you are asked for your login, type:
anonymous
Enter password as queried (your password is your actual userid:
yourlogin at yourhost.whatever.whatever - be sure to include the "@")
cd /pub/harnad/BBS
To show the available files, type:
ls
Next, retrieve the file you want with (for example):
get bbs.howe
When you have the file(s) you want, type:
quit
More information about the Connectionists
mailing list