Does backprop need the derivative ??
E. Fiesler
efiesler at idiap.ch
Mon Feb 8 03:22:31 EST 1993
Marwan Jabri wrote:
> Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1993 23:49:53 +1100
> From: Marwan Jabri <marwan at sedal.su.oz.au>
> Subject: Re: Does backprop need the derivative ??
>
> As the intention of the inquirer is the analog implementation of
> backprop, I see two problems: 1- the question whether the derivative can
> be replaced by a constant, and more importantly 2- whether the precision
> of the analog implementation will be high enough for backprop to work.
>
> Regarding (1), ...
>
> Regarding (2), there has been several reports indicating that
> backpropagation simply does not work when the number of bits is reduced
> towards 6-8 bits!
This is often reported for standard backpropagation. However, a simple
extension of backpropagation can make it work for any precision;
up to 1-2 bits. I'll append the reference(s) below.
E. Fiesler
Directeur de Recherche
IDIAP
Case postale 609
CH-1920 Martigny
Switzerland
@InProceedings{Fiesler-90,
Author = "E. Fiesler and A. Choudry and H. J. Caulfield",
Title = "A Weight Discretization Paradigm for Optical
Neural Networks",
BookTitle = "Proceedings of the International Congress on
Optical Science and Engineering",
Volume = "SPIE-1281",
Pages = "164--173",
Publisher = "The International Society for Optical
Engineering Proceedings",
Address = "Bellingham, Washington, U.S.A.",
Year = "1990",
ISBN = "0-8194-0328-8",
Language = "English" }
@Article{Fiesler-93,
Author = "E. Fiesler and A. Choudry and H. J. Caulfield",
Title = "A Universal Weight Discretization Method for
Multi-Layer Neural Networks",
Journal = "IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
(IEEE-SMC)",
Publisher = "The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
(IEEE), Inc.",
Address = "New York, New York",
Year = "1993",
ISSN = "0018-9472",
Language = "English",
Note = "Accepted for publication." }
More information about the Connectionists
mailing list