Connectionists: Stephen Hanson in conversation with Geoff Hinton
Gary Marcus
gary.marcus at nyu.edu
Mon Jul 18 12:32:25 EDT 2022
sure, but this goes back to Tom’s point about representation; i addressed this sort of thing at length in Chapter 3 of The Algebraic Mind.
You can solve this one problem in that way but then give up most of the other virtues of Transformers etc if you build a different network and representational scheme for each problem you encounter.
> On Jul 18, 2022, at 9:19 AM, Barak A. Pearlmutter <barak at pearlmutter.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 at 17:02, Gary Marcus <gary.marcus at nyu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> sure, but a person can learn [n-bit parity] from a few examples with a small number of bits, generalizing it to large values of n. most current systems learn it for a certain number of bits and don’t generalize beyond that number of bits.
>
> Really? Because I would not think that induction of a two-state DFA
> over a two-symbol alphabet woud be beyond the current state of the
> art.
>
> --Barak Pearlmutter.
More information about the Connectionists
mailing list