Connectionists: four neural modeling articles about visual and spatial navigation
Stephen Grossberg
steve at cns.bu.edu
Tue Jul 21 11:38:45 EDT 2009
The following articles about visual and spatial navigation are now
available at http://cns.bu.edu/~steve :
Elder, D., Grossberg, S., and Mingolla, M
A neural model of visually guided steering, obstacle avoidance, and
route selection.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, in
press.
ABSTRACT
A neural model is developed to explain how humans can approach a goal
object on foot while steering around obstacles to avoid collisions in
a cluttered environment. The model uses optic flow from a 3D virtual
reality environment to determine the position of objects based on
motion discontinuities, and computes heading direction, or the
direction of self-motion, from global optic flow. The cortical
representation of heading interacts with the representations of a goal
and obstacles such that the goal acts as an attractor of heading,
while obstacles act as repellers. In addition the model maintains
fixation on the goal object by generating smooth pursuit eye
movements. Eye rotations can distort the optic flow field,
complicating heading perception, and the model uses extraretinal
signals to correct for this distortion and accurately represent
heading. The model explains how motion processing mechanisms in
cortical areas MT, MST, and posterior parietal cortex can be used to
guide steering. The model quantitatively simulates human
psychophysical data about visually-guided steering, obstacle
avoidance, and route selection.
Key Words: Heading perception, steering, optic flow, obstacle, goal,
pursuit eye movement, gain fields, peak shift, V2, MT, MST, PPC, LIP
Browning, A., Grossberg, S., and Mingolla, M.
A neural model of how the brain computes heading from optic flow in
realistic scenes.
Cognitive Psychology, in press.
ABSTRACT
Visually-based navigation is a key competence during spatial
cognition. Animals avoid obstacles and approach goals in novel
cluttered environments using optic flow to compute heading with
respect to the environment. Most navigation models try either explain
data, or to demonstrate navigational competence in real-world
environments without regard to behavioral and neural substrates. The
current article develops a model that does both. The ViSTARS neural
model describes interactions among neurons in the primate
magnocellular pathway, including V1, MT+, and MSTd. Model outputs are
quantitatively similar to human heading data in response to complex
natural scenes. The model estimates heading to within 1.5° in random
dot or photo-realistically rendered scenes, and within 3° in video
streams from driving in real-world environments. Simulated rotations
of less than 1 degree per second do not affect heading estimates, but
faster simulated rotation rates do, as in humans. The model is part
of a larger navigational system that identifies and tracks objects
while navigating in cluttered environments.
Key Words: navigation, optic flow, heading, motion, visual cortex,
V1, MT, MST, neural model
Browning, A., Grossberg, S., and Mingolla, M.
Cortical dynamics of navigation and steering in natural scenes: Motion-
based object segmentation, heading, and obstacle avoidance.
Neural Networks, in press.
ABSTRACT
Visually guided navigation through a cluttered natural scene is a
challenging problem that animals and humans accomplish with ease. The
ViSTARS neural model proposes how primates use motion information to
segment objects and determine heading for purposes of goal approach
and obstacle avoidance in response to video inputs from real and
virtual environments. The model produces trajectories similar to those
of human navigators. It does so by predicting how computationally
complementary processes in cortical areas MT-/MSTv and MT+/MSTd
compute object motion for tracking and self-motion for navigation,
respectively. The model retina responds to transients in the input
stream. Model V1 generates a local speed and direction estimate. This
local motion estimate is ambiguous due to the neural aperture problem.
Model MT+ interacts with MSTd via an attentive feedback loop to
compute accurate heading estimates in MSTd that quantitatively
simulate properties of human heading estimation data. Model MT-
interacts with MSTv via an attentive feedback loop to compute accurate
estimates of speed, direction and position of moving objects. This
object information is combined with
heading information to produce steering decisions wherein goals behave
like attractors and obstacles behave like repellers. These steering
decisions lead to navigational trajectories that closely match human
performance.
Key Words: Optic flow, navigation, MT, MST, motion segmentation,
object tracking
Grossberg, S.
Beta oscillations and hippocampal place cell learning during
exploration of novel environments.
Hippocampus, in press.
ABSTRACT
The functional role of synchronous oscillations in various brain
processes has attracted a lot of
experimental interest. Berke et al. (2008) reported beta oscillations
during the learning of
hippocampal place cell receptive fields in novel environments. Such
place cell selectivity can
develop within seconds to minutes, and can remain stable for months.
Paradoxically, beta power
was very low during the first lap of exploration, grew to full
strength as a mouse traversed a lap
for the second and third times, and became low again after the first
two minutes of exploration.
Beta oscillation power also correlated with the rate at which place
cells became spatially
selective, and not with theta oscillations. These beta oscillation
properties are explained by a
neural model of how place cell receptive fields may be learned and
stably remembered as
spatially selective categories due to feedback interactions between
entorhinal cortex and
hippocampus. This explanation allows the learning of place cell
receptive fields to be understood
as a variation of category learning processes that take place in many
brain systems, and
challenges hippocampal models in which beta oscillations and place
cell stability cannot be
explained.
Key Words: grid cells, category learning, spatial navigation, adaptive
resonance theory, entorhinal cortex
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://mailman.srv.cs.cmu.edu/mailman/private/connectionists/attachments/20090721/143873f3/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Connectionists
mailing list