Connectionists: conditioning, dopamine, amygdala, hypothalamus, basal ganglia, orbitofrontal cortex
Stephen Grossberg
steve at cns.bu.edu
Thu Aug 14 09:03:51 EDT 2008
The following articles about reinforcement learning are now available
at
<http://cns-web.bu.edu/Profiles/Grossberg/>http://www.cns.bu.edu/~steve
Mark R. Dranias, Stephen Grossberg, and Daniel Bullock
Dopaminergic and Non-Dopaminergic Value Systems in Conditioning and
Outcome-Specific Revaluation
Brain Research, in press.
ABSTRACT
Animals are motivated to choose environmental options that can best
satisfy current needs. To explain such choices, this paper
introduces the MOTIVATOR (Matching Objects To Internal VAlues
Triggers Option Revaluations) neural model. MOTIVATOR describes
cognitive-emotional interactions between higher-order sensory
cortices and an evaluative neuraxis composed of the hypothalamus,
amygdala, and orbitofrontal cortex. Given a conditioned stimulus
(CS), the model amygdala and lateral hypothalamus interact to
calculate the expected current value of the subjective outcome that
the CS predicts, constrained by the current state of deprivation or
satiation. The amygdala relays the expected value information to
orbitofrontal cells that receive inputs from anterior inferotemporal
cells, and medial orbitofrontal cells that receive inputs from rhinal
cortex. The activations of these orbitofrontal cells code the
subjective values of objects. These values guide behavioral choices.
The model basal ganglia detect errors in CS-specific predictions of
the value and timing of rewards. Excitatory inputs from the
pedunculopontine nucleus interact with timed inhibitory inputs from
model striosomes in the ventral striatum to regulate dopamine burst
and dip responses from cells in the substantia nigra pars compacta
and ventral tegmental area. Learning in cortical and striatal
regions is strongly modulated by dopamine. The model is used to
address tasks that examine food-specific satiety, Pavlovian
conditioning, reinforcer devaluation, and simultaneous visual
discrimination. Model simulations successfully reproduce discharge
dynamics of known cell types, including signals that predict saccadic
reaction times and CS-dependent changes in systolic blood pressure.
Keywords: amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, rhinal cortex, lateral
hypothalamus, inferotemporal cortex, basal ganglia, conditioning,
motivation, devaluation, food-specific satiety, dopamine,
cognitive-emotional interactions, decision-making, discrimination
learning
******************
Stephen Grossberg, Daniel Bullock, and Mark R. Dranias
Neural Dynamics Underlying Impaired Autonomic and Conditioned
Responses Following Amygdala and Orbitofrontal Lesions
Behavioral Neuroscience, in press.
ABSTRACT
A neural model is presented that explains how outcome-specific
learning modulates affect, decision-making and Pavlovian conditioned
approach responses. The model addresses how brain regions
responsible for affective learning and habit learning interact, and
answers a central question: What are the relative contributions of
the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex to emotion and behavior? In
the model, the amygdala calculates outcome value while the
orbitofrontal cortex influences attention and conditioned responding
by assigning value information to stimuli. Model simulations
replicate autonomic, electrophysiological, and behavioral data
associated with three tasks commonly used to assay these phenomena:
Food consumption, Pavlovian conditioning, and visual discrimination.
Interactions of the basal ganglia and amygdala with sensory and
orbitofrontal cortices enable the model to replicate the complex
pattern of spared and impaired behavioral and emotional capacities
seen following lesions of the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex.
Keywords: Pavlovian conditioning, inferotemporal and rhinal cortex,
amygdala, basal ganglia, orbitofrontal cortex
More information about the Connectionists
mailing list