Parallel Paper Submission

Jay McClelland jlm at cnbc.cmu.edu
Mon Jun 5 16:42:55 EDT 2006


>
>
> I wholeheartedly agree with Tom.  Parallel submission would create
> a huge waste of reviewer time, and would lead to many bad feelings
> if a paper is accepted to two outlets.  Obviously the problem with
> the sequential approach is that review turnaround can be slow.  This
> is an issue that we all can and should work on.
>
>  -- Jay McClelland
>





More information about the Connectionists mailing list