Subject: Article on the computational power of winner-take-all
Wolfgang Maass
maass at igi.tu-graz.ac.at
Wed Nov 24 09:46:41 EST 1999
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The following article is now online available :
On the Computational Power of Winner-Take-All
Wolfgang Maass
Technische Universitaet Graz, Austria
Abstract:
Everybody ``KNOWS'' that neural networks need more than a single
layer of nonlinear units to compute interesting functions.
We show that this is FALSE if one employs winner-take-all as
nonlinear unit:
* Any boolean function can be computed by a single
k-winner-take-all unit applied to weighted sums of the input
variables.
* Any continuous function can be approximated
arbitrarily well by a single soft winner-take-all unit applied to
weighted sums of the input variables.
* Only positive weights are needed in these (linear)
weighted sums. This may be of interest from the point of view of
neurophysiology, since only 15% of the synapses in the cortex are
inhibitory.
* Our results support the view that winner-take-all
is a very suitable basic computational unit in Neural VLSI:
- it is wellknown that winner-take-all of n input
variables can be computed very efficiently with 2n transistors
(and a total wire length and area that is linear in n ) in
analog VLSI [Lazzaro et al., 1989]
- we show that winner-take-all is not just useful for
special purpose computations, but may serve as the only nonlinear
unit for neural circuits with universal computational power
- we show that any multi-layer perceptron needs
quadratically in n many gates to compute winner-take-all for
n input variables, hence winner-take-all provides a
substantially more powerful computational unit than a perceptron
(at about the same cost of implementation in analog VLSI).
------------------------------------------------------------------
The full version of this article will appear in Neural Computation.
It can be downloaded from
http://www.tu-graz.ac.at/igi/maass/#Publications
(see publication # 113).
An extended abstract will appear in the Proceedings of NIPS 1999.
More information about the Connectionists
mailing list