Seminar announcement
Gary Cottrell
gary at cs.ucsd.edu
Tue Mar 2 20:44:04 EST 1993
SEMINAR
Cascading Maps:
Reorganization of Cortex in the Dog
Garrison W. Cottrell
Department of Dog Science
Southern California Condominium College
"My dog is an old dog. A major difference between
owning a young dog and owning an old dog is walks.
Young dog walks exercise the master; old dog walks
exercise the master's patience. The major reason
for this is _s_n_i_f_f_u_l_a _a_d _n_a_u_s_e_u_o_s_o, Latin for "this
dog can't stop sniffing stuff". Lest you think I am
talking about something illegal, this dog just will
not stop sniffing a bush, a tree, or even a bare
spot on the sidewalk. You could be there for 10
minutes and he wouldn't be done yet."
--Professor Ebeneezer Huggenbotham
The old dog sniffing problem (ODSP), or "Huggenbotham's
tenth problem", has provided a rich source of data for
recent advances in connectionist dog modeling. Ever since
McDonnell & Pew's (McD & P) "Brain state in a Ball"[1] model
of the dog olfactory bulb as an multi-state attractor, a
debate has sprung up around the issue of whether a
connectionist net can actually exhibit dog-like behavior, or
whether you needed to be a dog to possess dog-like behavior
(McDonnell & Pew, 1986; Peepee, 1988; Pluckit & Walkman,
1989).
McD & P's model hypothesizes that since the brain state is
in a ball, it can't ever get stuck in a corner, so it just
wanders the surface of the sphere[2]. Thus the network never
habituates to incoming signals. Peepee's critique of McD &
P's model was that since McD & P's model only contained 3
units, it could never represent the variety of smells
available to old dogs. Pluckit & Walkman showed that
indeed, there were an infinite number of points on a
hypersphere, so anything was representable. Further, they
showed that If one assumed the models had started with many
more units in a hypercube, and lost them decrementally,
converging on a 3-D sphere, that one could account for many
of the _d_e_g_r_a_d_a_t_i_o_n_a_l _a_s_p_e_c_t_s of the old dog's mind. While
these models accounted for many of the psychological
findings, the present paper seeks to integrate recent
neurophysiological findings into a new understanding of old
dog behavior.
One of the most striking phenomena found today in the
cortical map literature is the amazingly fast
reorganization of cortical maps. In monkeys whose fingers
have been severed, the somatosensory map reorganizes to
represent the other fingers more than before[3].
Fortunately for dogs, they do not have fingers. Fortunately
for monkeys, it is also found that the map will reorganize
without vivisection. If the monkey is simply required to
use a particular fingertip for some task, the map will
allocate more space to that fingertip. The surprising thing
about this cortical reorganization is that it is 1) fast,
happening over hours or days and 2) present in adults[4].
This suggests that our cortical maps may be constantly
reorganizing. Furthermore, since this appears to be a
Hebbian-based reorganization, dependent upon activity, other
maps connected to this one should also reorganize. That is,
reorganization will not be confined to somatosensory maps,
but will _c_a_s_c_a_d_e to other areas.
These observations suggest a new theory about representation
in the elder dog's cortex. As we all know, _s_m_e_l_l is the
sense most associated with memory. Since input from the
eyes and ears degrades with age, the olfactory input will
begin to dominate brain activity in the older dog. The
visual and auditory maps will reorganize to respond to
smell. They will not of course, _r_e_p_r_e_s_e_n_t smell, but will
be driven more by smell than by eyes because of activity
dependent remapping. This will cause re-activation of vivid
scenes associated with those smells. Hence, this suggests
that the reason older dogs spend an order of magnitude
greater time than a younger dog sniffing the same spot is
that they are _r_e_m_i_n_i_s_c_i_n_g.
____________________
[1]Unlike Anderson's model of human cortex as a "Brain
State in a Box", the states of the network are not allowed
to extend outside of a _h_y_p_e_r_s_p_h_e_r_e. This explains why hu-
mans are smarter than dogs: Humans can reach the _c_o_r_n_e_r_s of
the hypercube.
[2]Recently, more statistically based models have argued
that the Kullback-Leibler information transmitted by an old
nose was on the order of 1 bit per second (Chapel, 93), sug-
gesting the behavior is entirely a peripheral deficit. Ex-
perimental 1200 baud "nodem"'s are being implanted in
several dogs as a possible cure.
[3]This line of research suggests that some scientists
did not pull enough legs off of spiders when they were
younger.
[4]This also suggests that modern American adult males,
whose somatosensory maps overrepresent certain areas, are
capable of change.
More information about the Connectionists
mailing list