AAAI-94 Call for Papers
Rick Skalsky
skalsky at aaai.org
Fri Jul 30 16:02:00 EDT 1993
Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
(AAAI-94)
Seattle, Washington
July, 31-August 4, 1994
Call for Papers
AAAI-94 is the twelfth national conference on artificial
intelligence (AI). The purpose of the conference is to
promote research in AI and scientific interchange among AI
researchers and practitioners.
Papers may represent significant contributions to any
aspects of AI: a) principles underlying cognition, perception,
and action; b) design, application, and evaluation of AI
algorithms and systems; c) architectures and frameworks for
classes of AI systems; and d) analysis of tasks and domains
in which intelligent systems perform.
One of the most important functions served by the national
conference is to provide a forum for information exchange
and interaction among researchers working in different sub-
disciplines, in different research paradigms, and in different
stages of research. Based on discussions among program
committee members during the past few years, we aim to
expand active participation in this year's conference to
include a larger cross-section of the AI community and a
larger cross-section of the community's research activities.
Accordingly, we encourage submission of papers that:
describe theoretical, empirical, or experimental results;
represent areas of AI that may have been under-represented
in recent conferences; present promising new research
concepts, techniques, or perspectives; or discuss issues that
cross traditional sub-disciplinary boundaries. As outlined
below, we have revised and expanded the paper review
criteria to recognize this broader spectrum of research
contributions. We intend to accept more of the papers that
are submitted and to publish them in an expanded
conference proceedings.
Requirements for Submission
Authors must submit six (6) complete printed copies of their
papers to the AAAI office by January 24, 1994. Papers
received after that date will be returned unopened.
Notification of receipt will be mailed to the first author (or
designated author) soon after receipt. All inquiries regarding
lost papers must be made by February 7, 1994. Authors
should also send their paper's title page in an electronic mail
message to abstract at aaai.org by January 24, 1994.
Notification of acceptance or rejection of submitted papers
will be mailed to the first author (or designated author) by
March 11, 1994. Camera-ready copy of accepted papers will
be due about one month later.
Paper Format for Review
All six (6) copies of a submitted paper must be clearly
legible. Neither computer files nor fax submissions are
acceptable. Submissions must be printed on 8 1/2" x 11" or
A4 paper using 12 point type (10 characters per inch for
typewriters). Each page must have a maximum of 38 lines
and an average of 75 characters per line (corresponding to
the LaTeX article-style, 12 point). Double-sided printing is
strongly encouraged.
Length
The body of submitted papers must be at most 12 pages,
including title, abstract, figures, tables, and diagrams, but
excluding the title page and bibliography. Papers exceeding
the specified length and formatting requirements are subject
to rejection without review.
Blind Review
Reviewing for AAAI-94 will be blind to the identities of the
authors. This requires that authors exercise some care not to
identify themselves in their papers. Each copy of the paper
must have a title page, separate from the body of the paper,
including the title of the paper, the names and addresses of
all authors, a list of content areas (see below) and any
acknowledgements. The second page should include the
exact same title, a short abstract of less than 200 words, and
the exact same content areas, but not the names nor
affiliations of the authors. The references should include all
published literature relevant to the paper, including
previous works of the authors, but should not include
unpublished works of the authors. When referring to one's
own work, use the third person, rather than the first person.
For example, say "Previously, Korf [17] has shown that...",
rather than "In our previous work [17] we have shown
that...". Try to avoid including any information in the body
of the paper or references that would identify the authors or
their institutions. Such information can be added to the final
camera-ready version for publication. Please do not staple
the title page to the body of the paper.
Electronic Title Page
A title page should also be sent via electronic mail to
abstract at aaai.org, in plain ASCII text, without any
formatting commands for LaTeX, Scribe, etc. Each section of
the electronic title page should be preceded by the name of
that section as follows:
title: <title>
author: <name of first author>
address: <address of first
author>
author: <name of last author>
address: <address of last
author>
abstract: <abstract>
content areas: <first area>, ..., <last area>
To facilitate the reviewing process, authors are requested to
select 1-3 appropriate content areas from the list below.
Authors are welcome to add additional content area
descriptors as needed.
AI architectures, artificial life, automated reasoning, control,
belief revision, case-based reasoning, cognitive modeling,
common sense reasoning, computational complexity,
computer-aided education, constraint satisfaction, decision
theory, design, diagnosis, distributed AI, expert systems,
game playing, genetic algorithms, geometric reasoning,
knowledge acquisition, knowledge representation, machine
learning, machine translation, mathematical foundations,
multimedia, natural language processing, neural networks,
nonmonotonic reasoning, perception, philosophical
foundations, planning, probabilistic reasoning, problem
solving, qualitative reasoning, real-time systems, robotics,
scheduling, scientific discovery, search, simulation, speech
understanding, temporal reasoning, theorem proving, user
interfaces, virtual reality, vision
Submissions to Multiple Conferences
Papers that are being submitted to other conferences,
whether verbatim or in essence, must reflect this fact on the
title page. If a paper appears at another conference (with the
exception of specialized workshops), it must be withdrawn
from AAAI-94. Papers that violate these requirements are
subject to rejection without review.
Review Process
Program committee (PC) members will identify papers they
are qualified to review based on each paper's title, content
areas, and electronic abstract. This information, along with
other considerations, will be used to assign each submitted
paper to two PC members. Using the criteria given below,
they will review the paper independently. If the two
reviewers of a paper agree to accept or reject it, that
recommendation will be followed. If they do not agree, a
third reviewer will be assigned and the paper will be
discussed by an appropriate sub-group of the PC during its
meeting in March. Note that the entire review process will be
blind to the identities of the authors and their institutions. In
general, papers will be accepted if they receive at least two
positive reviews or if they generate an interesting
controversy among the reviewers. The final decisions on all
papers will be made by the program chairs.
Questions that will appear on the review form appear below.
Authors are advised to bear these questions in mind while
writing their papers. Reviewers will look for papers that
meet at least some (though not necessarily all) of the criteria
in each category.
Significance
How important is the problem studied? Does the approach
offered advance the state of the art? Does the paper stimulate
discussion of important issues or alternative points of view?
Originality
Are the problems and approaches new? Is this a novel
combination of existing techniques? Does the paper point
out differences from related research? Does it address a new
problem or one that has not been studied in depth? Does it
introduce an interesting research paradigm? Does the paper
describe an innovative combination of AI techniques with
techniques from other disciplines? Does it introduce an idea
that appears promising or might stimulate others to develop
promising alternatives?
Quality
Is the paper technically sound? Does it carefully evaluate the
strengths and limitations of its contributions? Are its claims
backed up? Does the paper offer a new form of evidence in
support of or against a well-known technique? Does the
paper back up a theoretical idea already in the literature
with experimental evidence? Does it offer a theoretical
analysis of prior experimental results?
Clarity
Is the paper clearly written? Does it motivate the research?
Does it describe the inputs, outputs, and basic algorithms
employed? Are the results described and evaluated? Is the
paper organized in a logical fashion? Is the paper written in
a manner that makes its content accessible to most AI
researchers?
Publication
Accepted papers will be allocated six (6) pages in the
conference proceedings. Up to two (2) additional pages may
be used at a cost to the authors of $250 per page. Papers
exceeding eight (8) pages and those violating the instructions
to authors will not be included in the proceedings.
Copyright
Authors will be required to transfer copyright of their paper
to AAAI.
Paper Submissions & Inquiries
Please send papers and conference registration inquiries to:
AAAI-94
American Association for Artificial Intelligence
445 Burgess Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025-3496
Registration and call clarification inquiries (ONLY) may be
sent to the Internet address: NCAI at aaai.org.
Please send program suggestions and inquiries to:
Barbara Hayes-Roth, Program Cochair
Knowledge Systems Laboratory
Stanford University
701 Welch Road, Building C
Palo Alto, CA 94304
bhr at ksl.stanford.edu
Richard Korf, Program Cochair
Department of Computer Science
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA 90024
korf at cs.ucla.edu
Howard Shrobe, Associate Program Chair
Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, MA, 02139
hes at reagan.ai.mit.edu
More information about the Connectionists
mailing list