regarding quantum neural computer announcement

[Peter Turney]

> Second, since the famous experiment by Aspect et al to test
> Bell's inequality in 1982 it is generally agreed that EPR
> correlations appear to be of action-at-a-distance type. Some
> assert that "measurements or observations, in the sense
> required by quantum theory, can only be made by conscious
> observers".

I am not a physicist, but it is my understanding that there is
another way of looking at measurements. Instead of saying
"measurements ... can only be made by conscious observers",
you can talk about reversible and irreversible events.
The key thing about a measurement is not whether it is
made by an conscious observer, but whether it is an
irreversible event. Is this not a viable alternative
to dragging consciousness into quantum mechanics?

- Peter Turney