Pellionisz' "Open Letter"
Kiyoto Ishimaru
ishimaru at hamamatsu-pc.ac.jp
Sat Mar 7 07:58:59 EST 1992
Dear Moderator:
The recent response of Dr. Arbib brought my attention. The following is
my opinion about the issue:
1) Citing or not-citing in a paper should not be decided based on
KINDNESS to earlier related researches, but rather KINDNESS to
those who are supposed to read or to come across the prospective
paper.
2) Similarity or dissimilarity argument, based on the "subjective"
Riemannian space, lasts forever without any positive results.
The most important thing is who was the first person having
brought the tensor analysis "technique" into NN field. This
should be discussed.
3) Political or social issue, such as Japan-bashing and fierce
competition in R&D World-wide, should not be taken into account
on this issue. This kind of discussion style does not bring any
fruitful results, but makes the issue more complicated and rather
worse, and intangible.
4) Dr Amari's comments in his letter, quoted by Dr. Pellionisz,
"Indeed, when I wrote that paper, I thought to refer
to your paper", and " But if I did so, I could only state
that it is nothing to do with the geometrical appraoch
that I initiated"
may result in the conclusion: If Dr. Pellionisz' paper were
nothing to do with Dr. Amari's, citing Dr. Pellionisz' would
not have come across in his mind at all(but he actually did
think over). Direct public comments from Dr. Amari is urged on
this respect and others in order for both of them to get a
fair jugement.
Please be sure that I made the comment with an awkward feeling due to
lack of deep background with respect to the tensor analysis effect on NN
field. However, I am pleased with expressing my self on this e-mail.
Thank you.
Sincerely Yours
Kiyoto Ishimaru
Dept of Computer Science
Hamamatsu Polytechnic College
643 Norieda
Hamamatsu 432
Japan
e-mail: ishimaru at hamamatsu-pc.ac.jp
------------------------------
More information about the Connectionists
mailing list