ingber.eeg.ps.Z in Neuroprose archive
Lester Ingber
ingber at umiacs.UMD.EDU
Wed Aug 14 15:04:18 EDT 1991
The paper ingber.eeg.ps.Z has been placed in the Neuroprose archive.
This can be accessed by anonymous FTP on cheops.cis.ohio-state.edu
(128.146.8.62) in the pub/neuroprose directory.
This will laserprint out to 65 pages, so I give the abstract below to
help you decide whether it's worth it. (I also enclose a referee's
review afterwards to sway you the other way.) The six figures can
be mailed on request, and I'm willing to make some hardcopies of
the galleys or reprints, when they come, available. However, since
this project is funded out of my own pocket, I might have to stop
honoring such requests. The published paper will run 44 pages.
This message may be forwarded to other lists.
Lester Ingber
------------------------------------------
| |
| |
| |
| Prof. Lester Ingber |
| ______________________ |
| |
| |
| P.O. Box 857 703-759-2769 |
| McLean, VA 22101 ingber at umiacs.umd.edu |
| |
------------------------------------------
=======================================================================
Physical Review A, vol. 44 (6) (to be published 15 Sep 91)
Statistical mechanics of neocortical interactions:
A scaling paradigm applied to electroencephalography
Lester Ingber
Science Transfer Corporation, P.O. Box 857, McLean, VA 22101
(Received 10 April 1991)
A series of papers has developed a statistical mechanics of
neocortical interactions (SMNI), deriving aggregate behavior of
experimentally observed columns of neurons from statistical
electrical-chemical properties of synaptic interactions. While
not useful to yield insights at the single neuron level, SMNI has
demonstrated its capability in describing large-scale properties
of short-term memory and electroencephalographic (EEG) systemat-
ics. The necessity of including nonlinear and stochastic struc-
tures in this development has been stressed. In this paper, a
more stringent test is placed on SMNI: The algebraic and numeri-
cal algorithms previously developed in this and similar systems
are brought to bear to fit large sets of EEG and evoked potential
data being collected to investigate genetic predispositions to
alcoholism and to extract brain "signatures" of short-term
memory. Using the numerical algorithm of Very Fast Simulated
Re-Annealing, it is demonstrated that SMNI can indeed fit this
data within experimentally observed ranges of its underlying
neuronal-synaptic parameters, and use the quantitative modeling
results to examine physical neocortical mechanisms to discrim-
inate between high-risk and low-risk populations genetically
predisposed to alcoholism. Since this first study is a control
to span relatively long time epochs, similar to earlier attempts
to establish such correlations, this discrimination is incon-
clusive because of other neuronal activity which can mask such
effects. However, the SMNI model is shown to be consistent with
EEG data during selective attention tasks and with neocortical
mechanisms describing short-term memory (STM) previously pub-
lished using this approach. This paper explicitly identifies
similar nonlinear stochastic mechanisms of interaction at the
microscopic-neuronal, mesoscopic-columnar and macroscopic-
regional scales of neocortical interactions. These results give
strong quantitative support for an accurate intuitive picture,
portraying neocortical interactions as having common algebraic or
physics mechanisms that scale across quite disparate spatial
scales and functional or behavioral phenomena, i.e., describing
interactions among neurons, columns of neurons, and regional
masses of neurons.
PACS Nos.: 87.10.+e, 05.40.+j, 02.50.+s, 02.70.+d
=======================================================================
Report of Referee Manuscript No. AD4564
Over the years, I had several occasions to review papers by Lester Ingber.
However, there was never time enough to fully digest and
comprehend all of the details to convince myself that his efforts of
developing a theoretical basis for describing neocortical brain functions
are in fact sound and not just speculative. This paper dispels all
those reservations and doubts, but unfortunately it is rather lengthy.
This paper, and the research behind it, is pioneering, and it needs to be
published. The question is whether Physical Review A is the appropriate
journal.
Since the paper reviews and presents in a rather comprehensive fashion
the research by Lester Ingber in the area of modeling neocortical
brain functions, I recommend that it be submitted to Review of
Modern Physics.
=======================================================================
------------------------------------------
| |
| |
| |
| Prof. Lester Ingber |
| ______________________ |
| |
| |
| P.O. Box 857 703-759-2769 |
| McLean, VA 22101 ingber at umiacs.umd.edu |
| |
------------------------------------------
More information about the Connectionists
mailing list