Mathematical Tractability of Neural Nets
slehar@bucasb.bu.edu
slehar at bucasb.bu.edu
Sun Feb 25 21:14:41 EST 1990
Thank you for your lengthy reply to my posting. I do not dispute the
variability of functional organization between individuals' brains,
and I am intrigued by the organizational differences based on language
that you pointed out. My point was not that brains are identical
enough that pinpointing a lesion can necessarily lead to an accurate
prediction of deficits (although admittedly that is what I said).
What I meant to say is that the functionality of areas has been
identified to a level of detail that would surprise many "neural
network" modellers. The fact that the 'task' of speech, for example
is functionally divided into the components generally performed by
Brocca's area (grammar and articulation), Wernicke's (meaning),
angular gyrus (vocabulary), right hemisphere (prosidy), frontal areas
(initiation of speech), motor strip (execution of speech) etc. is
extremely interesting to the neural modeler, as it gives a clue as to
how a parallel speech system can be organized, while leaving open the
tantalizing question of the fine level microstructure required for
such a system to be actually implemented. It is the specific
functionality of each area that has been mapped in such detail, not
the physical location of that area in any particular individual. (In
other words, if Broccas area is pinpointed in a particular individual,
then lesion of that area will produce predictable deficits)
In fact the very variability of the actual locations of such areas is
equally interesting, and provides further clues as to the underlying
mechanisms. The fact that a lesion nearby can induce a functional
area like Broccas area to 'move over' to an adjacent region really
emphasizes the adaptability and variability of the system, and until
we duplicate that type of adaptability, we will not have duplicated
the functionality either.
Thank you for all your references to interesting work- I will preserve
them for future reading.
Steve Lehar
More information about the Connectionists
mailing list