technical report available
Stephen J Hanson
jose at tractatus.bellcore.com
Wed Mar 22 10:44:09 EST 1989
Princeton Cognitive Science Lab Technical Report: CSL36, February, 1989.
COMPARING BIASES FOR MINIMAL NETWORK
CONSTRUCTION WITH BACK-PROPAGATION
Stephen Jos'e Hanson
Bellcore
and
Princeton Cognitive Science Laboratory
and
Lorien Y. Pratt
Rutgers University
ABSTRACT
Rumelhart (1987), has proposed a method for choosing minimal or
"simple" representations during learning in Back-propagation
networks. This approach can be used to (a) dynamically select
the number of hidden units, (b) construct a representation that
is appropriate for the problem and (c) thus improve the
generalization ability of Back-propagation networks. The method
Rumelhart suggests involves adding penalty terms to the usual
error function. In this paper we introduce Rumelhart's minimal
networks idea and compare two possible biases on the weight
search space. These biases are compared in both simple counting
problems and a speech recognition problem. In general, the
constrained search does seem to minimize the number of hidden
units required with an expected increase in local minima.
to appear in Advances in Neural Information Processing, D. Touretzky Ed., 1989
Research was jointly sponsered by Princeton CSL and Bellcore.
REQUESTS FOR THIS TECHNICAL REPORT SHOULD BE SENT TO
laura at clarity.princeton.edu
Please do not reply to this message or forward, Thankyou.
More information about the Connectionists
mailing list