From rsun at rpi.edu Mon Oct 4 12:27:02 2004 From: rsun at rpi.edu (Professor Ron Sun) Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 12:27:02 -0400 Subject: [ACT-R-users] Cognitive Science Ph.D program at RPI Message-ID: <416179D6.70702@rpi.edu> I am looking for a few Ph.D students. The Ph.D program of the Cognitive Science department at RPI is accepting applications. Graduate assistantships and other forms of financial support for graduate students are available. Prospective graduate students with interests in Cognitive Science, especially in learning and skill acquisition and in the relationship between cognition and sociality, are encouraged to apply. Prospective applicants should have background in computer science (the equivalent of a BS in computer science), and have some prior exposure to psychology, artificial intelligence, connectionist models (neural networks), multi-agent systems, and other related areas. Students with a Master's degree already completed are preferred. RPI is a top-tier research university. This new CogSci department has identified the Ph.D program and research as its primary missions. The department is conducting research in a number of areas: cognitive modeling, human and machine learning, multi-agent interactions and social simulation, neural networks and connectionist models, human and machine reasoning, cognitive engineering, and so on. See the Web page below regarding my research: http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/~rsun For the application procedure, see http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/ The application deadline is Jan.15, 2005. If you decide to apply, follow the official procedure as outlined on the Web page. Send me a short email (in plain text, ASCII) AFTER you have completed the application. -- =================================================================== Professor Ron Sun Cognitive Science Department Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 110 Eighth Street, Carnegie 302A Troy, NY 12180, USA phone: 518-276-3409 fax: 518-276-3017 email: rsun at rpi.edu web: http://www.cogsci.rpi.edu/~rsun =================================================================== From Bej at cs.cmu.edu Tue Oct 5 15:11:00 2004 From: Bej at cs.cmu.edu (Bonnie John) Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:11:00 -0400 Subject: [ACT-R-users] Help with typing Message-ID: Folks, We are trying to recreate old Keystroke-Level Models and replicate their match to human data using CogTool, a new tool that uses ACT-R 5 as its underlying cognitive engine (with ACT-RPM 2.1.2 which may be a bit newer than what is currently packaged with ACT-R 5). Has anyone validated how ACT-R 5 does transcription typing? Our times are not matching human data. We are following the ACT-RPM motor module documentation, using press-key like it says to do for typing. But we keep getting an inter-keystroke time that averages about 0.5 sec, which is far slower than Card, Moran & Newell's estimate for touch typists (200 to 280 msec depending on how skilled). Of course, our models are coming out way too slow to match human data. Any suggestions? Thanks, Bonnie From db30 at andrew.cmu.edu Tue Oct 5 16:15:15 2004 From: db30 at andrew.cmu.edu (Dan Bothell) Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 16:15:15 -0400 Subject: [ACT-R-users] Help with typing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: --On Tuesday, October 05, 2004 3:11 PM -0400 Bonnie John wrote: > > Folks, > > We are trying to recreate old Keystroke-Level Models and replicate their > match to human data using CogTool, a new tool that uses ACT-R 5 as its > underlying cognitive engine (with ACT-RPM 2.1.2 which may be a bit newer > than what is currently packaged with ACT-R 5). > > Has anyone validated how ACT-R 5 does transcription typing? Our times are > not matching human data. > > We are following the ACT-RPM motor module documentation, using press-key > like it says to do for typing. But we keep getting an inter-keystroke > time that averages about 0.5 sec, which is far slower than Card, Moran & > Newell's estimate for touch typists (200 to 280 msec depending on how > skilled). Of course, our models are coming out way too slow to match > human data. > The current ACT-R 5 has RPM version 2.2, so it's actually newer than that, but that shouldn't make a difference. Press-key isn't really a "good" typist as indicated in the docs for the motor module, "The press-key command is included primarily as a programming convenience and does not represent an ACT-R theory of typing." After describing a learning mechanism which could be used to generate a theory of typing it says, "Until then, press key should be able to handle most normal typing assuming a fairly skilled typist." So, at some level it's not surprising that you can't use it to model expert performance. However, since the thing that you're indicating is an issue is the inter-key time I'd guess that you may be able to improve on that. The question is what are you using to check for the availability of the motor module? If you are testing the module's modality then there's room for improvement because it can pipeline commands. If you instead test that the preparation is free you should be able to get things going as fast as possible. As a quick test below is a model that uses press-key to type "the" as fast as possible which has inter-key times of 300ms. So, that may help some if you aren't doing it already. If that's not fast enough though, then I think you may need to look into motor learning issues which just aren't handled with the current RPM, or at least to add in what could be considered end results of such learning. For example, a new motor style for "chords" which could prepare and initiate multiple finger actions as a single unit, instead of the current press-key style that only allows one finger to be in operation at a time. Dan ;;; Quick and dirty model to press three keys using press-key as fast ;;; as it can. (clearall) (pm-reset) (chunk-type goal key) (add-dm (g isa goal key t)) (goal-focus g) (p press-t =goal> isa goal key t =manual-state> isa module-state preparation free ==> +manual> isa press-key key "T" =goal> key h ) (p press-h =goal> isa goal key h =manual-state> isa module-state preparation free ==> +manual> isa press-key key "H" =goal> key e ) (p press-e =goal> isa goal key e =manual-state> isa module-state preparation free ==> +manual> isa press-key key "E" =goal> key nil ) (pm-install-device (open-exp-window "test" :visible nil)) #| CG-USER(2): (pm-run 4) Time 0.000: Press-T Selected Time 0.050: Press-T Fired Time 0.050: Module :MOTOR running command PRESS-KEY Time 0.300: Module :MOTOR running command PREPARATION-COMPLETE Time 0.300: Press-H Selected Time 0.350: Module :MOTOR running command INITIATION-COMPLETE Time 0.350: Press-H Fired Time 0.350: Module :MOTOR running command PRESS-KEY Time 0.450: Device running command OUTPUT-KEY << Window "test" got key #\t at time 450 >> Time 0.550: Module :MOTOR running command PREPARATION-COMPLETE Time 0.550: Press-E Selected Time 0.600: Module :MOTOR running command FINISH-MOVEMENT Time 0.600: Press-E Fired Time 0.600: Module :MOTOR running command PRESS-KEY Time 0.650: Module :MOTOR running command INITIATION-COMPLETE Time 0.750: Device running command OUTPUT-KEY << Window "test" got key #\h at time 750 >> Time 0.800: Module :MOTOR running command PREPARATION-COMPLETE Time 0.900: Module :MOTOR running command FINISH-MOVEMENT Time 0.950: Module :MOTOR running command INITIATION-COMPLETE Time 1.050: Device running command OUTPUT-KEY << Window "test" got key #\e at time 1050 >> Time 1.200: Module :MOTOR running command FINISH-MOVEMENT Time 1.200: Checking for silent events. Time 1.200: * Nothing to run: No productions, no events. 1.2 1.2 |# From ja+ at cmu.edu Wed Oct 6 13:53:09 2004 From: ja+ at cmu.edu (John Anderson) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 13:53:09 -0400 Subject: [ACT-R-users] ACT-R web site Message-ID: Colleagues: We have more or less completed our efforts to update the ACT-R web site to reflect the events of the summer. I encourage you to go there, see the new baby picture, and make sure you are accurately reflected there. We would be interested to hear from you: If you are not listed there and want to be. If you are listed there and don't want to be. If your institutional listing is correct. If there are other people at your institution that should (or shouldn't) be listed. If there are papers of yours that we have missed or papers that we should not list. If the papers listed with you are accurately categorized. If there are other links or news that we should include. And anything else you think we should be made aware of. Thanks, John -- ========================================================== John R. Anderson Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Phone: 412-268-2788 Fax: 412-268-2844 email: ja at cmu.edu URL: http://act.psy.cmu.edu/ From sean.zuzu at gmail.com Wed Oct 13 13:50:40 2004 From: sean.zuzu at gmail.com (zuzu) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:50:40 -0400 Subject: [ACT-R-users] Fwd: John Anderson talk this Friday In-Reply-To: <430ec66204101211254b53f9d2@mail.gmail.com> References: <430ec66204101211254b53f9d2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Il-Young Son Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:24:03 -0400 Subject: Fwd: John Anderson talk this Friday To: il.young.son at gmail.com Begin forwarded message: > From: "Birsen Yazici" > Date: October 12, 2004 2:19:02 PM EDT > To: "Il-Young Son" > Subject: Fw: John Anderson talk this Friday > > > ----- Original Message ----- > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 1:17 PM > Subject: John Anderson talk this Friday > > > 2004 -05 > > CORE DEBATES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE > > How to Build Smart Machines! > > John Anderson > > How to Make ACT-R > A > Smart Human > > > Friday, October 15 > 4:00 p.m. > Sage Laboratory 4101 > > > John Anderson, Professor of Psychology and Computer Science at > Carnegie Mellon University and creator of the leading computational > system for simulating human thought (the cognitive architecture > ACT-R), will focus on how one might improve ACT-R in accord with the > criteria Anderson & Lebiere proposed for the Newell Test. He will > begin with a review of ACT-R theory and the web of evidence that > supports it and go on to review the assessment Anderson & Lebiere gave > of ACT-R vs. connectionism regarding a set of functional criteria for > human-level intelligence set forth by Allen Newell. Professor > Anderson argues that those among the Newell functionalities on which > ACT-R or other cognitive theories have done well are ones that do not > distinguish humans from other primates. Finally, he will discuss what > he and his colleagues have done and hope to do to get ACT-R to address > the Newell functionalities that are unique to humans. > > > > QUESTIONS? > > Contact Heather Hewitt, hewith at rpi.edu > > Jim Fahey, faheyj2 at rpi.edu > Department of Cognitive Science > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > 110 8th Street | Troy, NY 12180-3590 USA > Carnegie Building | Phone (518) 276-6272 | Fax (518) 276-3017 > > Heather Hewitt > Assistant to the Chair > Department of Cognitive Science > Carnegie Bldg. 312 > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > hewitt at rpi.edu > (518) 276-6472 > From ja+ at cmu.edu Thu Oct 21 09:06:38 2004 From: ja+ at cmu.edu (John Anderson) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:06:38 -0400 Subject: [ACT-R-users] Post doctoral position Message-ID: We are looking for a post-doctoral student to work on a project modeling the acquisition of high school algebra. The goal of the project is to give a model that background knowledge that a beginning algebra student might have and have it learn given the instructional interaction that a student might receive. While the modeling is the core of the project, other aspects extend to formalizing the learning environment and matching human data including fMRI data. If you are interested please contact me. -- ========================================================== John R. Anderson Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Phone: 412-268-2788 Fax: 412-268-2844 email: ja at cmu.edu URL: http://act.psy.cmu.edu/ From rwilson+ at pitt.edu Thu Oct 21 20:15:32 2004 From: rwilson+ at pitt.edu (roy wilson) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:15:32 -0400 Subject: [ACT-R-users] An ACT-R oriented reaction to Clancey's SItuated Cognition discussion of memory, representations, etc. Message-ID: <41785124.9040807@pitt.edu> I am just starting to read Clancey's book, am a bit startled by some of his assertions, and I wonder whether anyone specifically "in" the ACT-R community has commented on the book. It would be nice to read the comments and the book "together". I see some discussion of situated cognition in a 2002 issue of Cognitive Systems Research, but thought it might be more efficient to go to the source. Roy Wilson Learning Research Development Center University of Pittsburgh From markus.eklund at gmail.com Fri Oct 22 17:57:12 2004 From: markus.eklund at gmail.com (Markus Eklund) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:57:12 -0700 Subject: [ACT-R-users] ACT-R: Prior knowledge measurement Message-ID: Hi, I am a graduate student at San Diego State University (Educational Technology department) where I am conducting a Master's Thesis on Prior knowledge as it relates to the concept of Transactional Distance; see end of e-mail for the concept description. I would like to use the Activation Equation (and several others) in my study but have some questions: 1. Given that I do not neccessarily know the background of my students (e.g. I can't easily estimate the evolution of knowledge and performance through presentations), how can I measure Bi? Is there anyone out there who has already developed/validated instruments (I am only interested in the cognitive module) for this? 2. When looking at individual differences, I have read studies in which differences in skill acquisition are influenced by architectural factors. But is anyone researching/modeling the how initial differences in declarative and procedural memory (including problem solving strategies) influence skill acquisition? 3. Does the 'Integrated Theory of the Mind' paper list all the fundamental equations in ACT-R? Thanks for the assistance, Markus Eklund PS: Transactional Distance: Is a function of the variance in dialogue and structure as they related to each other; therefore, 'distance' in education is not deteremined by geographic proximity (as anyone in a large lecture hall receiving a lecture knows), but by the level and rate of dialogue and structure. One of my hypothesis' is that 'there is an inverse relationship (possibly also an exponential relationship depending on how the dialog is structured) between the level of prior knowledge and transactional distance. For more details on Transactional Distance, see Saba, F. & Shearer, R. 1994. Verifying Key Theoretical Concepts in a Dynamic Model of Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education. From ja+ at cmu.edu Wed Oct 27 08:15:46 2004 From: ja+ at cmu.edu (John Anderson) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:15:46 -0400 Subject: [ACT-R-users] ACT-R 2005 Workshop in Trieste, July 15-17 Message-ID: Colleagues: I am pleased to announce the the 2005 ACT-R Workshop will be in Trieste, hosted by Danilo Fum. The last day will be July 17, the Sunday before Cognitive Science in Stresa (which begins July 21). More information will follow as details are worked out. However, we wanted to get the information out now in response to requests from some who wanted to plan their travels. The ACT-R Summer School will be held in Pittsburgh in June. The dates are still to be worked out. --John -- ========================================================== John R. Anderson Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Phone: 412-268-2788 Fax: 412-268-2844 email: ja at cmu.edu URL: http://act.psy.cmu.edu/ From Kevin.Gluck at mesa.afmc.af.mil Fri Oct 29 17:52:46 2004 From: Kevin.Gluck at mesa.afmc.af.mil (Kevin.Gluck at mesa.afmc.af.mil) Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:52:46 -0700 Subject: [ACT-R-users] Senior Scientist Position Available Message-ID: <671474002216D14B8D440C71877F9A8D44C7FE@FSQBGE07.williams.afmc.ds.af.mil> All, Please see the attachment for information about a Senior Scientist position available at Wright-Patterson AFB. They are specifically interested in hiring someone with a strong international reputation in cognitive modeling, HCI, cognitive engineering, decision making, and/or decision support systems. If you are interested in this position and consider yourself qualified for it, please contact ... Dr. Kenneth R. Boff, ST Chief Scientist, Human Effectiveness Directorate (937) 255-6327 ken.boff at wpafb.af.mil If you know someone else who may be interested and qualified, please forward this announcement. Thank you, Kevin ------------------------------------------------------- Kevin A. Gluck, PhD Research Psychologist Air Force Research Laboratory 6030 S. Kent St. Mesa, AZ 85212-6061 Ph: 480-988-6561 x-234 / DSN 474-6234 Cell: 480-229-4569 Fax: 480-988-6285 PALM Lab Website: http://www.mesa.afmc.af.mil/html/palmlab.htm "Anyone with an idea whose time has come can accomplish anything provided they are willing to work hard enough." - Cecil Burney -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ST Position Synopsis .doc Type: application/msword Size: 36864 bytes Desc: not available URL: