cognitive model interfaces paper
Frank E. Ritter
ritter at ist.psu.edu
Fri Jul 12 13:30:18 EDT 2002
cognitive model's interface was presented at the Computer Generated
Forces conference, and at the Soar workshop, so many of you have
already heard about it. But those, who haven't seen it and should be
interested in it, are on these mailing lists, so I'm sending out a
pointer to it as well.
The paper includes an initial task analysis for models' explanatory
displays. The results should be interesting to both Soar, Jack, and
ACT-R interface builders, including those who are just building
interfaces for their own models. I append its abstract and URL
--
Cheers,
Frank
Using Multidisciplinary Expert Evaluations to Test and Improve Cognitive
Model Interfaces
Marios N. Avraamides
Department of Psychology
The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA 16802
+1 (814) 865-4455
marios at psu.edu
Frank E. Ritter
School of Information Sciences and Technology
The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA 16802
+1 (814) 865-4453
ritter at ist.psu.edu
Keywords:
Subject-matter experts, situation awareness, cognitive models
Typically, the design of cognitive models has not emphasized the role
of interfaces for describing the
models' behavior. Models that populate synthetic environments are
particularly complex and need support in this area.
Using a variety of subject-matter experts we evaluated the use of the
Situation Awareness Panel (SAP) as a tool for
inspecting the behavior and reasoning of Soar agents in a JSAF
simulation. We gathered suggestions on how to
improve future implementations of the SAP from experts in a variety
of disciplines, including military pilots, cognitive
psychologists, an HCI specialist, a logistic specialist, and a
software designer. Because of their diversity, we found that
all were able to report unique problems with the interface, and thus
now suggest about twice as many experts be used
for evaluations than were previously suggested and that the experts
should vary in their perspective. We used their
behavior and reports to develop a task analysis that can be used as a
general guide for future designs of user interfaces
for cognitive models in general and for the design of interfaces for
models in synthetic environments in particular. We
suggest this approach of having multiple types of experts review an
interface as a general method for improving
complex interfaces such as interfaces to cognitive models.
In Proceedings of the 11th Computer-Generated Forces and Behavior
Representation Conference
pp. 553-562, 02-CGF-100. Orlando, FL: U. of Central Florida
http://acs.ist.psu.edu/papers/avraamidesR02.pdf
More information about the ACT-R-users
mailing list