architecture comparison references
Kevin.Gluck at williams.af.mil
Kevin.Gluck at williams.af.mil
Mon Aug 20 21:01:08 EDT 2001
suggestions for papers that compare computational cognitive modeling
architectures. I received several very helpful responses, and a few people
have suggested that I share the references. Good idea. Sorry it has taken
me such an embarrassingly long time to get around to sending this out.
- Kevin
-------------------------------
Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought.
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson, T. R. (1997). Control in ACT-R and Soar. In Proceedings of the 19th
Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 343-348). Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Jones G. (1996). The architectures of Soar and ACT-R, and how they model
human behaviour. Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour
Quarterly, 96, 41-44.
Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (2000). The role of cognitive task analysis in
the application of predictive models of human performance. In J. M. C.
Schraagen, S. E. Chipman, & V. L. Shalin (Eds.), Cognitive task analysis.
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Klahr, D., & MacWhinney, B. (1998) Information Processing. In D. Kuhn & R.
S. Siegler (Eds.), W. Damon (Series Ed.). Handbook of child psychology (5th
ed.): Vol. 2: Cognition, perception, and language. New York: Wiley.
Lallement, Y., & John, B. E. (1998) Cognitive architecture and modeling
idiom: An examination of three models of the Wicken's task. In Proceedings
of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Lin, H., Koubek, R., Haas, M., Phillips, C., & Brannon, N. (2001). Using
cognitive models for adaptive control and display. Automedica, 19, 211-239.
Neches, R., Langley, P., & Klahr, D. (1987). Learning, development and
production systems. In D. Klahr, P. Langley, & R. Neches (Eds.), Production
system models of learning and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pew, R. W., & Mavor, A. S. (1998). Modeling Human and Organizational
Behavior: Application to Military Simulations. Washington, D. C.:
National Academy Press.
Richman, H. B. & Simon, H. A. (1989). Context effects in letter perception:
A comparison of two theories. Psychological Review, 96 (3), 417-432.
Ritter, F. E., Shadbolt, N. R., Elliman, D., Young, R., Gobet, F., & Baxter,
G. D. (2001). Techniques for modeling human performance in synthetic
environments: A supplementary review. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH:
Human Systems Information Analysis Center.
Sun, R., Merrill, E., and Peterson, T. (2001). From implicit skills to
explicit knowledge: a bottom-up model of skill learning. Cognitive Science,
25(2), 203-244.
Taatgen, N. A. (1999). Learning without limits: From problem solving towards
a unified theory of learning. Doctoral dissertation, University of
Groningen. <http://www.ub.rug.nl/eldoc/dis/ppsw/n.a.taatgen/>
VanLehn, K. (Ed.) (1991). Architectures for Intelligence: The 22nd Carnegie
Mellon Symposium on Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (especially the
chapters by Clancey and Pylyshyn)
Young, R. M. (1999). ACT-R and Soar still have much to learn from each
other. In Proceedings of the 6th ACT-R Workshop, George Mason University.
(also, Kokinov and Petrov have a bunch of papers about the DUAL architecture
available at <http://www.nbu.bg/cogs/personal/kokinov/index.html>
... some of which include explicit comparisons to other architectures.
----------------------------------------------------
Kevin A. Gluck, PhD
Research Psychologist
Air Force Research Laboratory
6030 S. Kent St.
Mesa, AZ 85212-6061
Ph: 480-988-6561 x-234 / DSN 474-6234
Fax: 480-988-6285
More information about the ACT-R-users
mailing list