FW: "Working Memory"
Kirschenbaum_Susan
kirsch at c223.npt.nuwc.navy.mil
Wed Nov 27 09:04:56 EST 1996
Into the semantic frey: I sent the attached message to Christian shortly
after receiving his first message. Now, given Dave Klahr's note about
documenting the birth of a technical term/new technical meaning for an old
term, I add it to the discussion.
More than that, I wanted to respond to Chris Schunn's suggestion that "dme"
might be seen as "a hacker's invention" -- I disagree, it is a useful
shorthand for declarative memory element. Isn't that exactly what the term is
intended to mean? It is more percise to invent a new term than to try to
redefine and old one, even if some of the associated baggage is "useful and
relevant." Chris's suggestion that non-ACT-Rers be consulted is a good way to
resolve this question. Does chunk carry too much baggage or the wrong baggage
(see Wayne's comments re procedural memory)? Does/can dme, lump, clump,
clod, hunk, gob, nugget, or wad best carry the right, percise, technical
meaning? My personal vote is for the new term, dme, but I am not a casual or
novice user or reader of this literature.
Susan
_______________________________________________________________________________
From: Kirschenbaum_Susan on Mon, 25 Nov 1996 9:12 am
Subject: RE: "Working Memory"
To: Christian J Lebiere
Christian,
I think this is a good idea. My personal objection is that the new terms
"addchunk," etc. are longer, giving me more opportunity to make typos. ;-)
Seriously, the only real problem that the term "chunk" is used with a slightly
different meaning by other architectures. This could cause confusion, both
for the researcher who uses both architectures, and for the reader of this
scientific literature. I wish there were an alternative term such as
"declarative memory element," typed as "DME."
What do you think?
Susan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Susan S. Kirschenbaum, Ph.D.
Code 2214, Building 1171/1
Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division
Newport, RI 02841
Tel: (401) 841-3354 Fax: (401) 841-4749
Kirsch at c223.npt.nuwc.navy.mil
More information about the ACT-R-users
mailing list