<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div dir="ltr"></div><div dir="ltr">I think you should really pose this question to Yann LeCun, who recently said “LLMs have a more superficial understanding of the world than a house cat“ (<a href="https://twitter.com/ylecun/status/1621861790941421573?s=61&t=eU_JMbqlN1G6Dkgee1AzlA">https://twitter.com/ylecun/status/1621861790941421573?s=61&t=eU_JMbqlN1G6Dkgee1AzlA</a>)</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Curious to hear how the conversation goes. </div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On Mar 10, 2023, at 10:04 AM, Geoffrey Hinton <geoffrey.hinton@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br><div>A former student of mine, James Martens, came up with the following way of demonstrating chatGPT's lack of understanding. He asked it how many legs the rear left side of a cat has. </div><div>It said 4. </div><div><br></div><div>I asked a learning disabled young adult the same question. He used the index finger and thumb of both hands pointing downwards to represent the legs on the two sides of the cat and said 4.</div><div>He has problems understanding some sentences, but he gets by quite well in the world and people are often surprised to learn that he has a disability. </div><div><br></div><div>Do you really want to use the fact that he misunderstood this question to say that he has no understanding at all?</div><div>Are you really happy with using the fact that chatGPT sometimes misunderstands to claim that it never understands?</div><div><br></div><div>Geoff</div><div><br></div></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>